Government must be more proactive on
addressing public health issues
During question
period today in the House of Assembly, Opposition Leader Yvonne Jones raised
a number of issues related to public health issues and whether government
has done enough work to protect the general public from unhealthy buildings
and chemicals that are potentially causing sickness.
Jones raised three issues related to health concerns
including asbestos problems at St. Pat’s Mercy Home in St. John’s, air
quality issues at the Registry of Deeds in Confederation Building and a
proposed ban on the use of cosmetic pesticides in the province.
“Last spring we raised the issue of asbestos problems
at St. Pat’s nursing home in St. John’s after hearing from workers concerned
for their health,” said Ms. Jones. “We recently obtained under the Access to
Information Act Occupational Health and Safety reports regarding asbestos
exposure at the facility. These reports confirm that the building’s asbestos
management plan was not being followed prior to 2008. Documentation and
e-mail correspondence within the Department of Government Services also
stressed the need for a Medical Surveillance Program to be implemented to
assess any adverse health impacts on staff and residents who may have been
exposed to asbestos during that time. Unfortunately, government has not
acted on these recommendations to ensure no staff or residents of the
facilities have been exposed over the past number of years.”
In the documents obtained by the Official Opposition, a
November 2007 Occupational Health and Safety report states: “the employer
has not fulfilled their responsibilities for effective asbestos management.
And as such, the same deficiencies in workplace controls that were noted in
the past continue to exist today.”
“Workers at the Registry of Deeds in the basement of
Confederation Building are also raising concerns about air quality. Legal
title searchers employed with various law firms throughout the province work
in the “vault” of the registry where older property titles are kept. These
workers have expressed concerns about potential exposure to chemicals,
asbestos or mould in this area of the registry, especially after 14 out of
35 workers have been diagnosed with cancer over the past five years. They
have continuously asked government to look into the situation and provide
detailed testing results. These workers and the general public have a right
to know whether any testing has been completed, what the results have been
and whether this has had any impact on their health.”
Jones also raised the issue of a proposed ban on the
use of cosmetic pesticides in the province. “Over the summer a Provincial
Working Group was formed with the goal of banning the cosmetic use of
pesticides in the province. This coalition has raised public awareness over
the use of pesticides and the potential health impacts of their use. We know
the Minister met with her Atlantic counterparts to discuss this issue,
however, no action or updates have come since.”
Jones also
referenced the fact that this coalition had been working with Municipalities
Newfoundland and Labrador to have a resolution passed at their recent
convention calling for a province-wide ban on cosmetic pesticide use.
However, under the Municipalities Act, communities cannot enact by-laws
banning the cosmetic use of pesticides. She challenged the Minister of
Environment to bring forward the necessary amendments as requested by
Municipalities Newfoundland and Labrador to allow communities to move
forward with their own bans in the absence of any provincial action on the
issue.